March 2, 2013 by Hematite
Note: The following is in response to an article that appeared on February 28th on the WKOW web page, “Journalist loses credential after making obscene gesture in Senate chamber.”

Police guarding the doors of the press conference where Walker was planning to unveil a new ad campaign for the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation, shortly after coming under the scrutiny of HUD for losing track of $8M in loans. Credentialed journalists were denied access to the press event by police. September 27, 2012. Photo: Jenna Pope
In the shadows of the Senate balcony nestled between the stately pillars of the chamber, the professional press is assigned two long tables from which to report on the activities of the legislature. The Wheeler Report, Associated Press, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin State Journal, The Progressive, and a handful of other media outlets are granted press passes by Scott Fitzgerald to sit in the inner sanctum. There they record the proceedings for the express purpose to educate the public about the comings and goings of those who have the power.
Professional journalists have long enjoyed an access to political power denied to ordinary citizens, an access justified by the journalists’ theoretical role as an accurate and unbiased source of information that the citizens in a democracy need to make informed decisions. In an age when the Internet has destroyed the traditional press’ monopoly on the technology of mass communication, journalists increasingly cite the quality of the information they provide as separating them from mere bloggers, and justifying the continued existence of their profession.
The debate over iron mining reveals that if the profession of journalism is justified by the quality of the information it provides, there is no excuse for the continued existence of Wisconsin’s professional press.

Journalist Rebecca Kemble telling Sen. Glenn Grothman during Wednesday’s mining debate that he is a protagonist in the September 2013 cover story in The Progressive about the roll-back of civil rights. Photo: Nicole Schulte
Iron mining has been the subject of heated debate in Wisconsin for two years. During that time, the professional press has failed to produce more than a tiny handful of stories that adequately explain any of the scientific, economic or legal issues that must be understood in order to have a coherent opinion on the subject. Nor has the press pointed out the breathtaking ignorance of those issues that Republican proponents have displayed on every occasion where they have discussed mining. The press has never confronted mining company representatives on the contradictory and often deceitful explanations of their intentions that they have given in various public forums. The open corruption of Republican leaders taking millions in dollars in donations from mine companies has been passed over in silence, as has the crude racism of several of the mining bill’s chief proponents.
The problem is not that the press has been biased in favor of the mine, but that it has been incompetent.
In mining, as with so much else in Scott Walker’s Wisconsin, Republicans have operated with obscene contempt for the law and simple human decency, while the press, unwilling to risk its privileged access, has stayed silent. Yet let a member of the press sorority return to one of those Republicans an infinitesimal fraction of the scorn he habitually exudes toward everyone around him, and it is news.
When rules of decorum and “civility” become a shield for crime, they cease to have any legitimacy. Yet this is precisely the point at which such rules are most vigorously enforced by a Wisconsin press, eager as they are for any excuse to ignore the wholesale theft of the state by a criminal gang that is taking place under their noses. If the GOP were serving human flesh at a banquet, the only thing that would provoke criticism by the press is if one of the diners accidentally used a salad fork on the meat.
The State Legislature does not deserve respect.
And neither does the Wisconsin press.
“If the GOP were serving human flesh at a banquet, the only thing that would provoke criticism by the press is if one of the diners accidentally used a salad fork on the meat.” To be fair, they might report on the incompetence of the chef and waitstaff rather than a faux pax committed by one of their own.
Very well said. I agree that they don’t want to lose their seat at the table. Also part of the problem is that so many newspapers are owned by corporations. One corporation could own 20 or more newspapers. If it comes from “above” to leave a story alone, they must. This happens quite a bit with controversial issues. Another problem is that small newspapers must comply with their advertisers. Less than complimentary stories about public officials often generate the threat that if the story runs, the legals will be henceforth published in a different paper. County legal notices are often the bread and butter of small town weekly newspapers. It’s unfortunate that we barely get the real truth anymore. We just get the “spin” on the truth that public officials want us to see.